Bitcoin,
A Strategic Asset For Corporates
Auranj White Paper
I. Executive summary
Cash reserves held in dollars lose purchasing power every year. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the consumer dollar’s purchasing power has declined steadily over the past decade, with cumulative CPI-measured inflation of roughly 30% between 2014 and early 2026. [1, 2] Treasury bills and money market funds barely compensate.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin has become the highest-performing major financial asset of the past decade and an increasingly compelling candidate for long-term value preservation. With a fixed supply of 21 million units, enforced by open-source code and a decentralized global network, Bitcoin offers something no fiat currency or conventional reserve asset can match: true absolute scarcity.
Yet fewer than 1% of U.S. businesses hold Bitcoin in their treasuries. [21] The barriers are real: price volatility, fiduciary hesitation, accounting complexity, and the absence of financial infrastructure designed for corporate treasury operations.
Auranj is building financial products that help companies make Bitcoin a strategic treasury asset. Auranj’s first product enables companies to accumulate Bitcoin without exposing their principal to volatility. The mechanism is straightforward: a company deposits idle cash into an Auranj-managed account. The principal is allocated to short-duration U.S. Treasury bills and money market funds. The yield generated by those instruments is systematically directed into Bitcoin purchases. The company’s principal is never used to buy Bitcoin and is never at risk.
This paper presents the investment thesis, market context, structural tailwinds, and strategic rationale behind Auranj’s approach. It is intended for investors, prospective enterprise clients, and financial professionals evaluating Bitcoin as a component of corporate treasury strategy.
II. The problem: the silent erosion of corporate treasuries
The purchasing power trap
When a company holds cash, it is making an implicit bet that the dollar will preserve its value. That bet has consistently lost. The Federal Reserve’s own data shows that the purchasing power of the consumer dollar has been in decline for over a century, with the pace accelerating during periods of aggressive monetary expansion. [2]
Between January 2015 and January 2025, cumulative U.S. inflation as measured by CPI exceeded 30%. A company that held $10 million in cash throughout that period would have lost approximately $3 million in real purchasing power, with no entry on its income statement to reflect the loss. [1]
T-bill yields do not compensate for erosion
The standard corporate treasury response is to park cash in short-duration instruments: T-bills, money market funds, or commercial paper. While these provide some nominal yield, the real (inflation-adjusted) return is often negligible or negative. As of early 2026, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield stood around 4.2%, while year-over-year CPI inflation remained in the 2.4% range. [1] That gap is narrow, and it was negative for most of the 2020–2022 period when inflation spiked above 7% while short-term rates remained near zero.
M2 expansion: the structural driver
The root cause of dollar erosion is monetary expansion. The U.S. M2 money supply grew from approximately $15.4 trillion in January 2020 to $22.4 trillion by January 2026, an increase of roughly 45% in six years. [3, 4] Most of this expansion occurred in 2020–2021, driven by the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing in response to COVID-19. Although M2 contracted briefly in 2022–2023, it resumed growth and hit new records by mid-2025, reaching $22.02 trillion in June 2025 at a 4.5% year-over-year growth rate. [5, 29]
The Yale Budget Lab has estimated that sustained primary deficit increases of 1% of GDP create inflationary pressure equivalent to a cumulative $16,000 per-household loss in purchasing power over 30 years. [6] With the U.S. fiscal deficit tracking above $3 trillion for fiscal year 2025, the structural pressure on dollar purchasing power is not a transient phenomenon. It is policy.
A strategic problem, not an operational one
PwC’s 2025 Global Treasury Survey found that both CFOs and treasurers ranked cash and liquidity management as a top priority amid rising costs, interest rate fluctuations, and macroeconomic volatility. [7] The challenge is no longer just about optimizing cash conversion cycles. It is about protecting the real value of capital that a company has already earned. For firms holding significant cash reserves, the question of where that cash sits is a strategic decision with compounding consequences.
III. The macro context: why this problem is accelerating
Fiscal trajectory of the United States
The U.S. national debt has crossed $36 trillion. Annual deficits have remained above $1.5 trillion in recent years, with fiscal year 2025 on track for more than $3 trillion. Interest payments on federal debt are now among the largest line items in the federal budget, competing with defense and Social Security. As of late 2024, roughly 26% of the current money supply had been created since January 2020. [26] The Federal Reserve’s return to rate cuts in late 2024 and 2025 signals that the path of least resistance remains expansionary.
Global monetary expansion
This pattern is not unique to the United States. Global M2 supply has been expanding across major economies, as governments respond to slowing growth, demographic pressures, and geopolitical instability with fiscal stimulus. For any entity holding fiat-denominated reserves, the structural dynamic is the same: the denominator of value is expanding faster than the assets can generate real returns.
The institutional consensus is shifting
What was once a fringe idea, that Bitcoin could serve as a reserve asset, has moved into the institutional mainstream. On March 6, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order establishing a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, capitalized with government-held Bitcoin from forfeiture proceedings and prohibiting their sale. [12, 13] The White House described Bitcoin as ‘digital gold’ with a ‘strategic advantage’ to holding. Congress introduced legislation (H.R. 2112) to codify this order into law. [14]
At the state level, Texas signed SB 21 into law in June 2025, creating its own strategic Bitcoin reserve. [28] Other states have initiated similar legislative efforts. These are not speculative gestures. They represent a formal policy acknowledgment that Bitcoin has properties relevant to sovereign and institutional reserve management.
IV. Bitcoin as a treasury asset: the investment thesis
Absolute scarcity
Bitcoin’s total supply is capped at 21 million units by its protocol. This cap is not a policy target that can be revised by a committee. It is enforced by code, validated by a global network of nodes, and has remained unchanged since Bitcoin’s inception in 2009. As of April 2026, approximately 19.8 million Bitcoin have been mined. The issuance rate halves every four years (the most recent halving occurred in April 2024), meaning new supply is diminishing on a predictable schedule. No other financial asset, including gold, offers this degree of supply certainty.
The legitimization arc
Several developments in 2024–2026 have changed Bitcoin’s status as an institutional asset in concrete, measurable ways:
Spot Bitcoin ETFs
The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 opened Bitcoin to traditional portfolio allocation. By Q1 2026, total U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF assets under management exceeded $128 billion, with cumulative net inflows surpassing $65 billion since inception. [18] BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) alone crossed 800,000 BTC in holdings and surpassed $100 billion in AUM, making it one of the fastest-growing ETFs in history. [19]
FASB ASU 2023-08: fair value accounting
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2023-08, replacing the punitive impairment-only accounting model for crypto assets with fair value measurement. [8] Under the old rules, a company holding Bitcoin could only mark down losses but could never recognize unrealized gains until sale. This created a one-sided penalty that made corporate Bitcoin holdings appear worse on financial statements than they actually were. The new standard, effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, requires fair value reporting with changes recognized in net income. [9, 10]
U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
As discussed in Section III, the executive order of March 6, 2025, formally positioned Bitcoin as a U.S. government reserve asset. The order prohibited the sale of government-held Bitcoin and directed the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce to develop budget-neutral acquisition strategies. [12, 15] For corporate treasurers evaluating Bitcoin, the signal is difficult to ignore: the U.S. government has formally classified it as a reserve asset worth holding indefinitely.
V. The adoption wave: corporate Bitcoin treasury in 2025–2026
Corporate adoption of Bitcoin as a treasury asset accelerated sharply in 2025. By late 2025, roughly 200 publicly traded companies worldwide held Bitcoin on their balance sheets, nearly three times the number from the prior year. Collectively, they held over 688,000 BTC. [22] The top 100 public holders controlled over 1.13 million BTC, with Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) alone holding more than 713,000 BTC, approximately 63% of that total. [23, 24]
Beyond large companies
The River Financial Business Report (2025) revealed that corporate Bitcoin adoption is not limited to public companies and crypto-native firms. Businesses now hold 6.2% of total Bitcoin supply (approximately 1.3 million BTC), a 21-fold increase since January 2020. Perhaps more relevant to Auranj’s thesis: 75% of business Bitcoin users have fewer than 50 employees, with a median allocation of 10% of net income. [21] Small and mid-sized businesses are leading adoption by count, even if large treasury companies dominate by volume.
The gap that remains
Despite this growth, fewer than 1% of U.S. businesses currently hold Bitcoin. River Financial’s own assessment is that the primary remaining barrier is education and awareness, not infrastructure or regulation. [21] The infrastructure is in place. The accounting standards have been updated. The regulatory environment has shifted from hostile to accommodating. What is missing, for most companies, is a product designed to make the first step safe and simple.
VI. Why companies should build a Bitcoin reserve
Why should a company hold Bitcoin on its balance sheet? Auranj’s thesis rests on three distinct strategic advantages that a Bitcoin reserve creates for a corporation.
A company is valued by its balance sheet, not just its income statement
Traditional corporate finance focuses heavily on the income statement: revenue growth, margins, earnings per share. But a company’s valuation also reflects the quality and composition of its balance sheet. Bitcoin treasury companies have demonstrated this. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) abandoned traditional profit-based valuation in favor of balance-sheet metrics, most notably mNAV (market multiple of net asset value), which measures how the market prices the company relative to its Bitcoin holdings. [30]
The results have been striking. Strategy’s stock delivered a roughly 2,760% return since its first Bitcoin purchase in August 2020, compared to Bitcoin’s own 823% appreciation over the same period. [31] The market assigned a persistent premium to NAV, at points exceeding 2.7x, because investors were pricing in not just the current Bitcoin holdings but the company’s capacity to grow those holdings over time. [32, 33]
The lesson is consistent: a balance sheet that holds a scarce, appreciating asset can command a market premium that a cash-heavy balance sheet eroding to inflation cannot. For any company with idle cash sitting in low-yield instruments, the decision to accumulate Bitcoin is also a decision about how the market will value the company over time.
Bitcoin as collateral: borrowing against BTC without selling
Once a company has accumulated Bitcoin on its balance sheet, that Bitcoin becomes a productive financial asset beyond its appreciation potential. Specifically, Bitcoin can be used as collateral to borrow fiat currency for operational needs: payroll, capital expenditures, project financing, or working capital. The company accesses liquidity without selling the underlying asset, preserving its long-term position and avoiding taxable events. [34]
This market is maturing rapidly. JPMorgan Chase announced in 2025 that it would allow institutional clients to borrow against their Bitcoin holdings, using third-party custodians to secure the pledged tokens. [35] Specialized lenders like Ledn, Nexo, and Xapo already offer Bitcoin-backed loans at LTV ratios of 20–50%, with interest rates competitive with traditional secured lending. [36, 37] The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced in June 2025 that cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, can count as collateral in federal mortgage applications. [38]
For a corporate treasurer, the implication is direct: Bitcoin on the balance sheet is not dead capital. It is pledgeable collateral that can fund operations and growth without diluting equity, without selling assets, and without triggering capital gains. The more Bitcoin a company accumulates, the greater its borrowing capacity becomes.
Market-neutral yield: making BTC productive without selling
A common objection to holding Bitcoin is that it generates no yield. That objection is increasingly outdated. A growing ecosystem of market-neutral strategies allows holders to generate returns on their BTC without taking directional price risk and without selling.
The most established of these is the basis trade (also called cash-and-carry): holding spot BTC while shorting BTC futures to capture the premium between spot and futures prices. This is a delta-neutral position, meaning the holder’s profit comes from the structural spread, not from Bitcoin’s price going up or down. [39, 40] CF Benchmarks and CME Group data show that Bitcoin’s annualized front-month basis reached approximately 25% in early 2024. While basis has compressed as the market has matured, creative managers are layering yield sources. Securitize, for example, earned 10.78% annualized from a Bitcoin basis trade and an additional 4.25% by using BlackRock’s BUIDL fund as collateral, for a combined yield of roughly 20.71%. [41]
Other strategies include funding rate arbitrage on perpetual futures, covered call selling for option premium income, and institutional Bitcoin lending. Market-neutral crypto funds gained 14.4% through November 2025. [41] Over half of traditional hedge funds now hold crypto (55%, up from 47% in 2024), with many deploying exactly these types of market-neutral strategies. [41]
For Auranj’s clients, this creates a compounding loop. The company’s idle cash generates yield in T-bills and MMFs, which flows into Bitcoin. That Bitcoin can then be put to work through market-neutral strategies to generate additional yield, or used as collateral to raise capital for business operations. The reserve becomes a productive strategic asset, not a static line item on the balance sheet. Auranj will offer a range of products designed to help clients make their accumulated Bitcoin reserves both productive and strategic assets.
VII. The barrier: why most companies have not acted
Volatility and fiduciary risk
Bitcoin’s annualized volatility, while declining, remains substantially higher than traditional reserve assets. A CFO or board member considering a direct Bitcoin allocation faces the prospect of reporting a 20–30% drawdown in a single quarter. For most companies, this is incompatible with their fiduciary responsibilities and the expectations of lenders, auditors, and shareholders.
Accounting complexity
While FASB ASU 2023-08 resolves the most punitive aspects of crypto accounting, the fair value model introduces income statement volatility. [8] Companies must now report unrealized gains and losses in net income each period. This creates an additional source of earnings fluctuation that many companies prefer to avoid, particularly public companies sensitive to analyst expectations.
Lack of adapted infrastructure
The existing on-ramps to Bitcoin are designed primarily for three categories of users: retail investors (exchanges like Coinbase, Cash App), institutional traders (prime brokers, OTC desks), and large-scale treasury companies following the Strategy model (issuing debt and equity to purchase Bitcoin directly). None of these is optimized for a mid-market company with $5 million to $100 million in idle cash that wants Bitcoin exposure without principal risk. There is no product that bridges traditional corporate treasury management with systematic Bitcoin accumulation.
Board-level education deficit
Many boards and executive teams lack the technical and financial literacy to evaluate Bitcoin as a treasury asset. The result is inertia. Companies that might benefit from allocation remain on the sidelines, not because the opportunity is unclear, but because no one inside the organization is equipped to build the case. This is a product and distribution problem, not a thesis problem.
VIII. The Auranj approach: yield-funded Bitcoin accumulation
How it works
Auranj operates as a separately managed account (SMA) provider for U.S. companies. The core mechanism is designed around a single principle: accumulate Bitcoin without risking the principal.
A company deposits idle cash into its Auranj-managed account. The principal is allocated to short-duration, low-risk instruments, specifically U.S. Treasury bills and money market funds. These instruments generate yield. That yield is systematically used to purchase Bitcoin on behalf of the company. The company retains full ownership of both the cash instruments and the BTC.
Deposit: Company deposits idle cash into its SMA
Principal allocation: Allocated to U.S. T-bills and money market funds
Yield generation: Short-duration instruments generate yield
Bitcoin accumulation: Yield is used to purchase BTC systematically
Principal exposure: Principal is never used to buy BTC and is never at risk
Ownership: Company retains full ownership of both cash instruments and BTC
Why principal preservation matters
The distinction between Auranj’s model and direct Bitcoin purchase is fundamental. A company that buys $10 million of Bitcoin directly is immediately exposed to the full volatility of the asset. A company that deposits $10 million with Auranj retains that $10 million in T-bills and money market funds. Only the yield, perhaps 4–5% annually at current rates, is converted to Bitcoin. The company begins accumulating BTC from day one, but the downside scenario is limited to the yield portion, not the principal.
This design solves the core objection that prevents most CFOs from acting. It reframes Bitcoin allocation from a high-conviction directional bet into a low-risk, yield-redirection strategy. The principal continues to do what it has always done: sit in safe instruments. The difference is that the yield is now working toward a long-term strategic objective rather than marginally offsetting inflation.
Positioning within the corporate treasury workflow
Auranj is designed to fit into how corporate treasuries already operate. The SMA structure means each company has a segregated account with transparent reporting. There is no commingling of assets. The underlying instruments (T-bills, MMFs) are familiar to any CFO. The Bitcoin accumulation is systematic and passive, requiring no active trading decisions from the company. Auranj charges a management fee on assets under management; the principal is never touched for fee collection.
IX. Regulatory and accounting tailwinds
The regulatory and accounting environment for corporate Bitcoin holding has improved in concrete, measurable ways between 2024 and 2026. Several developments removed specific barriers that previously deterred corporate adoption.
FASB ASU 2023-08
As discussed in Section IV, this standard replaced the impairment-only model with fair value accounting. Under the old regime, a company that bought Bitcoin at $60,000 and watched it rise to $100,000 could not recognize the gain until sale, but if it fell to $50,000, the impairment was immediate and permanent. This asymmetry punished holders. The new standard, effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, treats Bitcoin similarly to equity securities: fair value is reported each period with changes in net income. The standard applies to all entities, public and private. [8, 10, 11]
SEC posture shift
The SEC’s approach to crypto assets shifted following the retirement of Chairman Gary Gensler and the nomination of Paul Atkins, who has been involved in crypto advocacy groups including the Token Alliance and the Chamber of Digital Commerce. SAB 121, which had required entities custodying crypto assets for others to record a liability on their balance sheets, was rescinded via SAB 122 in 2025. [11] This cleared a path for banks and financial institutions to offer crypto custody services without the previous punitive balance sheet treatment.
State-level adoption
Texas signed SB 21 into law on June 22, 2025, creating the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. [28] Multiple other states have introduced similar legislation. At the federal banking level, the OCC and FDIC announced in March 2025 that banks no longer need advance permission to engage in cryptocurrency activities. These changes collectively reduce the friction, legal ambiguity, and reputational risk associated with corporate Bitcoin holding.
X. Conclusion
Two years ago, most of the conditions described in this paper did not exist. The accounting was punitive. The regulatory posture was hostile. No U.S. ETFs held spot Bitcoin. The government had no stated position on Bitcoin as a reserve asset. All of that has changed. And yet, fewer than 1% of U.S. businesses have taken the step. [21]
This gap between readiness and action is what creates the opportunity for Auranj. Most companies will not follow the Strategy model of levered Bitcoin purchases. Most will not open a Coinbase account and make direct market buys. What they will do, when the right product exists, is redirect yield from instruments they already hold into an asset they increasingly recognize as strategically important.
Auranj is building that product. A yield-funded Bitcoin accumulation strategy, wrapped in a separately managed account, with the principal parked in T-bills and money market funds. No principal at risk. No need for board-level crypto expertise. No operational complexity beyond what a CFO already manages.
The next decade of corporate treasury management will look different from the last. The companies that begin accumulating Bitcoin now, through disciplined, risk-managed structures, will hold an asset that no amount of monetary expansion can dilute. Those that wait will spend more to accumulate less. With a fixed supply and growing institutional demand, the cost of waiting is not zero. Earlier entrants accumulate more at lower prices; later entrants accumulate less at higher ones. That arithmetic does not reverse.
XI. Sources
[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘Purchasing Power and Constant Dollars’ and CPI Inflation Calculator. https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
[2] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED), Purchasing Power of the Consumer Dollar (CUUR0000SA0R). https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUUR0000SA0R
[3] Federal Reserve Board, Money Stock Measures H.6 Release (March 2026). https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/current/default.htm
[4] Trading Economics, United States Money Supply M2. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m2
[5] Econovis, ‘U.S. M2 Money Supply’ analysis. https://www.econovis.net/insights/us-money-supply
[6] The Budget Lab at Yale, ‘The Inflationary Risks of Rising Federal Deficits and Debt.’ https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/inflationary-risks-rising-federal-deficits-and-debt
[7] PwC, ‘2025 Global Treasury Survey.’ https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/consulting/business-transformation/library/2025-global-treasury-survey.html
[8] FASB, ASU 2023-08, Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60), December 2023. https://www.fasb.org/page/PageContent?pageId=/projects/recently-completed-projects/accounting-for-and-disclosure-of-crypto-assets.html
[9] KPMG, ‘FASB issues final ASU on crypto asset accounting’ (July 2024). https://kpmg.com/us/en/frv/reference-library/2023/fasb-to-issue-final-crypto-asset-accounting-asu.html
[10] Grant Thornton, ‘ASU 2023-08 clarifies accounting for certain crypto assets’ (December 2023). https://www.grantthornton.com/insights/articles/audit/2023/snapshot/december/clarifies-accounting-for-certain-crypto-assets
[11] Deloitte DART, ‘FAQ About Implementation of the FASB Crypto Assets Standard’ (updated July 2025). https://dart.deloitte.com/USDART/home/publications/deloitte/heads-up/2024/faq-fasb-crypto-assets-standard-asu-2023-08
[12] The White House, ‘Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile,’ Executive Order (March 6, 2025). https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/establishment-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-united-states-digital-asset-stockpile/
[13] Federal Register, Executive Order 2025-03992 (March 11, 2025). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/11/2025-03992/establishment-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-united-states-digital-asset-stockpile
[14] Congress.gov, H.R. 2112, 119th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/2112/text
[15] CNBC, ‘Trump signs executive order establishing U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve’ (March 2025). https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/06/trump-signs-executive-order-for-us-strategic-bitcoin-reserve.html
[16] CoinGecko, ‘Bitcoin vs Traditional Assets Over 10 Years’ (2025). https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/bitcoin-versus-traditional-assets-price-returns
[17] Bitcoin Magazine Pro, ‘A Decade of Bitcoin Annual Returns and Insights for Investors.’ https://www.bitcoinmagazinepro.com/blog/a-decade-of-bitcoin-annual-returns-and-insights-for-investors/
[18] Blocklr, ‘Bitcoin ETF Performance Q1 2026.’ https://blocklr.com/news/bitcoin-etf-performance-q1-2026/
[19] The Block, ‘BlackRock’s bitcoin ETF surpasses 800,000 BTC in AUM’ (October 2025). https://www.theblock.co/post/373966/blackrock-bitcoin-etf-ibit-800000-btc-aum
[20] ETF.com, ‘$34 Billion Entered Crypto ETFs in 2025’ (December 2025). https://www.etf.com/sections/features/34-billion-entered-crypto-etfs-2025-investors-still-lost
[21] River Financial / Business Initiative, ‘Corporate Bitcoin Adoption in 2025: The Strategic Treasury Playbook’ (September 2025). https://www.businessinitiative.org/business-tips/bitcoin-business-treasury-strategy-2025/
[22] GnCrypto, ‘Bitcoin for Corporations returns at Bitcoin 2026’ (March 2026). https://www.gncrypto.news/news/bitcoin-for-corporations-bitcoin-2026-las-vegas/
[23] Cryip, ‘Bitcoin Treasuries: Top Public Companies Holding BTC in 2026’ (February 2026). https://cryip.co/top-public-companies-holding-btc-in-2026/
[24] DemandSage, ‘Top 40 Public Companies Holding Bitcoin 2026’ (March 2026). https://www.demandsage.com/public-companies-holding-btc/
[25] Yahoo Finance, ‘Companies Plan Bigger Bitcoin Treasury in 2026’ (January 2026). https://finance.yahoo.com/news/companies-plan-bigger-bitcoin-treasury-064241424.html
[26] Mises Institute, ‘Money Supply Growth Accelerates and Hits a 27-Month High’ (January 2025). https://mises.org/mises-wire/money-supply-growth-accelerates-and-hits-27-month-high
[27] Burr & Forman LLP, ‘Trump Administration Establishes Strategic Bitcoin Reserve’ (March 2025). https://www.burr.com/newsroom/articles/trump-administration-establishes-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-digital-asset-stockpile
[28] Wikipedia, ‘U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.’ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Strategic_Bitcoin_Reserve
[29] CoinDesk, ‘U.S. M2 Money Supply Hits Record High’ (July 2025). https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/07/02/u-s-m2-money-supply-hits-record-high-of-nearly-usd22t
[30] VanEck, ‘Deconstructing Strategy (MSTR): Premium, Leverage, and Capital Structure’ (May 2025). https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/digital-assets/matthew-sigel-deconstructing-strategy-mstr-premium-leverage-and-capital-structure/
[31] JunkBondInvestor, ‘Decoding the Paradox of MicroStrategy’s Premium to NAV’ (November 2024). https://www.junkbondinvestor.com/p/decoding-the-paradox-of-microstrategys
[32] CCN, ‘Why MSTR Trades at a Premium: Inside Strategy’s Bitcoin Bet and the Rise of mNAV’ (July 2025). https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/strategy-stock-mnav-premium-explained/
[33] TokenInsight, ‘MicroStrategy’s NAV Premium and BTC Yield’ (May 2025). https://tokeninsight.com/en/research/analysts-pick/microstrategy-s-nav-premium-and-btc-yield
[34] River Financial, ‘How to Borrow Against Bitcoin Safely.’ https://river.com/learn/bitcoin-backed-loans/
[35] Yahoo Finance / Bloomberg, ‘JPMorgan to Let Institutions Borrow Against Bitcoin and Ethereum Holdings’ (October 2025). https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wall-street-giant-jpmorgan-let-162419278.html
[36] Nexo, ‘How Bitcoin-Backed Loans Work in 2026’ (October 2025). https://nexo.com/blog/bitcoin-backed-loans
[37] APX Lending, ‘Crypto-Backed Loans: 2026 Guide’ (November 2025). https://apxlending.com/crypto-backed-loans-complete-guide
[38] Bitcoin Treasury Corporation, ‘2025 Milestones and Long-Term Growth Vision’ (December 2025). https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278555/Bitcoin-Treasury-Corporation-Highlights-2025-Milestones-and-Outlines-LongTerm-Growth-Vision
[39] CME Group OpenMarkets, ‘Spot ETFs Give Rise to Crypto Basis Trading’ (November 2025). https://www.cmegroup.com/openmarkets/equity-index/2025/Spot-ETFs-Give-Rise-to-Crypto-Basis-Trading.html
[40] CF Benchmarks, ‘Revisiting the Bitcoin Basis’ (October 2025). https://www.cfbenchmarks.com/blog/revisiting-the-bitcoin-basis-how-momentum-sentiment-impact-the-structural-drivers-of-basis-activity
[41] TradingView Hub, ‘Market Neutral Strategy in Crypto: Does It Actually Work?’ (March 2026). https://www.tv-hub.org/guide/market-neutral-strategy-crypto